HTAtlas
← Back to explore

Budget Impact Analysis—Principles of Good Practice

Guidelinepeer-reviewed

This guideline provides clear, practical advice on how to plan, carry out, and report a budget impact analysis for healthcare interventions, helping decision makers understand the financial consequences of adopting a new treatment or technology.

At a glance

Use when

Evaluating the financial impact of introducing a new health technology within a specific healthcare setting or payer context

Avoid when

Assessing long-term health outcomes or cost-effectiveness; use cost-utility analysis instead

Inputs

Healthcare cost data, intervention uptake rates, population size, treatment costs, market share projections

Outputs

Projected budget impact over a specified time horizon (e.g., annual costs), sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses

How it works

Developed by the ISPOR Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force, this guideline outlines methodological standards and best practices for structuring budget impact models, defining populations, selecting comparators, incorporating market dynamics, and transparently reporting results to support healthcare policy and reimbursement decisions.

HTA domains
Costs & Economic Evaluation
Assumptions
Stable healthcare prices over time, predictable market uptake, availability of reliable epidemiological and utilization data
Strengths
Standardizes methodology, improves transparency and credibility of analyses, supports consistent decision making across jurisdictions
Limitations
Does not assess cost-effectiveness or clinical outcomes directly, relies on assumptions about market dynamics and adoption rates
Also known as
ISPOR Budget Impact Analysis Guideline, BIA Good Practice Guideline

Questions this answers

References & sources

Related methods

Similar by meaning

Beta record. Based on the original catalogue summary; primary-source enrichment pending.