HTAtlas
← Back to explore

GRADE for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies

Methodpeer-reviewed

This method helps assess how confident we can be in the results of diagnostic tests and the effects of using those tests to guide treatment. It looks at how well a test identifies a condition and whether using it leads to better patient outcomes.

At a glance

Use when

Evaluating diagnostic tests or test-guided treatment strategies where evidence spans from test accuracy to clinical outcomes

Avoid when

Direct evidence on patient outcomes from diagnostic interventions is abundant and straightforward

Inputs

Evidence on diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes, and test-treatment pathways

Outputs

Graded assessment of certainty in evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic strategies

How it works

An extension of the GRADE framework for diagnostic accuracy and test-treatment strategies, this method evaluates the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations by considering the indirect pathway from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes. It addresses unique challenges such as variability in test interpretation, downstream consequences of testing, and linkage between diagnostic performance and clinical utility.

HTA domains
Clinical Effectiveness, Patient and Social Aspects
Categories
Appraisal
Assumptions
Test accuracy is linked to patient outcomes through a plausible chain of evidence; indirect evidence can be systematically evaluated
Strengths
Systematically addresses uncertainty in diagnostic pathways; integrates patient outcomes; transparent and structured approach
Limitations
Complex to apply when evidence chains are weak or missing; requires expert judgment in linking test performance to outcomes
Also known as
GRADE for diagnostics, Diagnostic GRADE, GRADE for test-treatment strategies

Questions this answers

References & sources

Similar by meaning

Beta record. Based on the original catalogue summary; primary-source enrichment pending.